× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Aarrgghh!  Foiled again!

Even this isn't working - moving a numeric zoned decimal variable with
embedded blanks to an alpha field converts the blanks to zeros in the alpha
field (still hex'40's in the numeric variable).

Egads, this seems to be much more difficult than it needs to be.  So, I guess
I can't move the data at all, I have to test it, I guess, using an alpha
overlay in a data structure?  Do any of the proposed new functions in the
free-format RPG survey deal with this problem?

So now I'm back to using CPYF with INCREL testing each numeric to be *LE their
maximum possible value, i.e., if HDRSHC is defined as 4 digits, 2 decimals,
the INCREL tests *IF HDRSHC *LE 99.99.  If HDRSHC does not consist of a truly
valid numeric value, the CPYF bombs with CPF2906.  (INCREL allows up to 50
tests.)  My fun is now complicated in that I have multiple formats in the
flatfile coming from the Oracle box.

BTW, I have genericized the CPYF utility to use any file you pass as a
parameter, in case anyone's interested.

Does anyone know if OPNQRYF will fail similar to CPYF with CPF2906?  Maybe I
can bypass the 50 variables limitation.  I know there's a 3000-character limit
for QRYSLT.  I won't have time to test this today; I have to get some real
work done. :-(

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------
Barbara, Hans, others,

I am moving towards the QUSLFLD solution you and others have mentioned.
However, in my development testing, I am being reminded that TESTN does not
work on numeric fields.  So now I have to move the numeric value to an alpha.
I will follow a tip that someone else shared last month:

     C                     MOVE *ZEROS    WORK## 31
     C                     MOVELHDRSWP    WORK##
     C                     TESTN          WORK##     91
     C                     MOVE *ZEROS    WORK##
     C                     MOVELHDRDTM    WORK##
     C                     TESTN          WORK##     92
     C... etc. for several more fields

But I am left wondering, since it is possible for numeric variables to DDEs,
why wasn't TESTN ever designed to work with both alpha and numeric variables?

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.