× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: DoU...
  • From: Jim Langston <jimlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:19:05 -0800
  • Organization: Pacer International

Thanks, 

With everyone's tips I was able to reduce it to this.  Incidentally, the
first code snippet I sent didn't work and I had to debug it, but the 
logic flow was right.  This, on the other hand, is a bit more cleaner.

Being able to specify just a few parts of the key for my key field is a
new one on me, and very beneficial.  I had a heck of a time getting my
original code to work as I was setting the date field to *LoVal and after
a bit of debugging did I discover that the date was sorted in *Descending
order.  Not having to specify the date in my key means I don't have to
worry about what order it's sorted in now.

RPG is becoming a lot more cleaner.  Good work Hans and Barbara 8-)

 C                   Eval                    ContAlpha = Bd_RXEqID
 C                   Eval                    ContNumber = Bd_RXEqNo

 C                   Eval      FoundMatch = *Off
 C     CCOHD_Key     SetLL     OHdRc
 C                   Reade     OHdRc
 C                   DoW       %Found(CCOHD04) And
 C                             FoundMatch = *Off
 C                   If        %Trim(OHRefB) = %Trim(Bd_RXInv#)
 C                   Eval      FoundMatch = *On
 C                   Else
 C                   Reade     OHdRc
 C                   EndIf

 C                   EndDo

 C                   If        FoundMatch
 C                   Except    FoundOne
 C                   EndIf

 C     CCOHD_Key     KList
 C                   KFld                    ContAlpha
 C                   KFld                    ContNumber

Scott Mildenberger wrote:
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Instead of using READ, use READE with a KLIST that only has the two parts of
> the equipment number.  That way, you don't have to check when you run out of
> records with a matching equipment number.  Or you could define a logical
> with all proper fields to check against and then just do a SETLL to check
> whether the record already exists.
> 
> Scott Mildenberger
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.