Re: int (-8.9)=-9 or -8 -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

     Seems open to interpretation, but my definition of any %int function 
     would be "the integer portion of".  By this definition, -8 is correct. 
     "The next smallest integer" seems a tad arbitrary to me.
     
     -- 
     Paul Cunnane


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: int(-8.9)=-9 or -8
Author:  "Laskosky; Matt" <MLaskosk@kmart.com> at InterNet
Date:    2000-03-02 6:36 am


And Perl returns -8, and according to my instructor this is correct since 
the function of %int(-8.9) is to return the integer value of the number w/o 
first rounding the number.
     
Who's right? 
     
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.