× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Bound RPGLE or Module/PGM RPGLE!
  • From: "Reger, Bill" <breger@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:42:02 -0500

FYI four.

William K. Reger
Senior Project Manager
Levitz Furniture Corporation
Phone:  (561) 994-5114
E-mail:  breger@levitz.com <mailto:breger@levitz.com> 

                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
                Sent:   Monday, October 25, 1999 6:15 PM
                To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com
                Subject:        Re: Bound RPGLE or Module/PGM RPGLE!

                 << File: MsgBdy1.txt >> Make your compilation instructions
easy!  Use the H specs to store binding directory and 
                stuff.  Less stuff to remember when compiling.  Beats the
comment section I used to have 
                'Compile instructions'.  If you do this you'll then be more
efficient to use 14.






                neeta@kantepudi.freeserve.co.uk on 10/24/99 09:45:53 AM
                Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
                To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
                cc:      
                Fax to: 
                Subject:        Bound RPGLE or Module/PGM RPGLE!

                Hi,
                I like to know the advantages/disadvantages of creating a
Bound RPGLE program or two step (Module and PGM) when there is a CALLB for a
module which is in a Service program.  The Service program is added to a
Binding directory.

                I have created the object by using option '14' from
WRKMBRPDM by assigning a named Activation group and the name of the Binding
directory, where the Service program is defined.  This way I have generated
only one object.

                My colleague advises me to create the program as a Module
first, and then use option '26' to create the program from WRKOBJPDM.
Instead of specifying the Binding directory, the Service program name is to
be specified in the create prompt. 

                I am not sure whether both the processes serve the same
purpose or specifying the Service program has advantages over the Binding
directory.

                Your comments are appreciated.

                Robert 

                
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.