× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Efficiency of Bound vs. Dynamic Calls
  • From: John P Carr <jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 22:33:00 -0400


Eric Wilson said;
<SNIP>
>>If you were to bind to a service program then you would incur (One time
 >>only) name resolution, <load the service program into memory>, do memory
<SNIP>

Great stuff Eric,    But one caveat of the service program,  It is a 
Real named object.   Meaning;  Like a regular *PGM type, (or anyother
object really)  it will take advantage of AS/400's single level store 
arch.    Meaning that if someone else just called that program
It may already be in memory and you actually will not incur  the 
price of bringing that object off Dasd into memory.  

John Carr



+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.