Re: Possible list mining??? SPAMCOP results

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill" <bubbzbill@subdimension.com>

> Which is why they allow someone accused of spam the ability to
challenge
> the accusation.  Anyone who does not follow the instructions in
the spam
> notice is blaming spamcop for their own lack of action.  All of
the
> "evidence" of the offending email is sent when a complaint is
sent as is
> the ability to appeal to a "marshal".
>
> Bill

Actually, I've been through the process, with a person who was on
an opt-in list, where every message gives the user the ability to
terminate. They asked to be on the list in the first place, then
didn't bother to take themselves off, then complained to spamcop.

So for every user that is an idiot, I have to go through a
justification process with a self-appointed vigilante. Spamcop is
charging the money - they are the ones who should be
investigating to see if it is a opt-in (or a virus, these days!).

They should be called Scamcop.

Brad Jensen



No thanks.