Re: NVMe's Namespace size -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: NVMe's Namespace size
From: Gad Miron <gadmiron@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:28:46 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi guys

IIRC upon arrival the new machine came with 8 64Tb NVMes (mirrored so it
was only 25Tb)
but only two 400Gb Namespaces were configured (Load source mirrored).
The IBM CE (IBM employee) configured the rest of the drives as 6401 Gb each.

Now for performance sake I need him to re-configure (if the cost is
reasonable)

Gad

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: NVMe's Namespace size , Jim Oberholtzer

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.