×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 7:50 PM x y <xy6581@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
AFAIK this is not consistent with DSPFD/DSPFFD and API output. Is this
variation by design or is it a miss?
If it's by design, it's frankly a very stupid design. There is a
storage column that is appropriate for reporting the actual bytes used
on the storage device. The length should match what DSPFFD says is the
length.
I don't think there is currently any way to get the DSPFFD length from
the provided view without using your own logic (for example, a CASE
expression that hardcodes the length when the type is date, time, or
timestamp).
John Y.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
