× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. March 2023

Re: Cume/Groups

I have done PTF groups more than 100 times and I apply all PTF groups together every time in a row.

ONE RULE: Perm apply ALL PTFs first, then IPL to complete that. THEN apply all the new groups temp.

ONE EXCEPTION: If you are far behind in T/Rs, such as 'more than 4'. In that case we will Slip the LIC with latest ReSpin first and then run all the groups.

- Larry

On 3/28/2023 1:11 PM, ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


In previous times, I would always use the following groupings when
installing groups of PTFs:

Cume/Hiper/DB2 as one Go PTF Option 8 set

Then other IBM groups all together as a separate Go PTF Option 8 set

Then any sets of individual straggler PTFs for apps and 3rd party concerns
as a final Go PTF Option 8 set





Is there anything wrong in this day and age with applying ALL the IBM
provided PTF groups together in one Go PTF Option 8 set? (cume/hipers/db2
and other groups at once, then a separate grouping for any stragglers as
described above)




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.