×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Nothing that I am aware of. You can suppress, via the LOGLVL() settings, joblogs for a job that completes normally but that CPF message goes into QHST so I doubt it's possible to suppress.
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of James H. H. Lampert via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 3:42 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James H. H. Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Suppressing job completion messages
I've just been asked whether it's possible to suppress completion
messages on batch jobs that end normally.
To my great surprise, I found that one could use MSGQ(*NONE) on the
SBMJOB command.
But that suppresses *all* messages. If the job hangs, with a QSYSOPR
message, nothing gets back to the user who submitted the job, to
indicate that it's waiting on a QSYSOPR message.
Is there something a bit less drastic? That would only suppress normal
completion?
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
