×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Patrik,
Yes, it's called TMKMAKE in QUSRTOOL and has shipped with OS/400 since ~V2R3 or V3R1?
See member TMKINFO in QUSRTOOL/QATTINFO. :-)
Cheers,
Mark
On Thursday, October 21, 2021, 11:27:23 AM EDT, Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Richard,
Am 21.10.2021 um 17:10 schrieb Richard Reeve <rjrjr64@xxxxxxxxx>:
I know that we can create logical files in different libraries than the physical files, but I don't like that idea. What are your thoughts as to the advantages/drawbacks of the multi library approach?
I'm using LFs in different libs than the PFs solely with join LFs to a common/general PF with data needed in different parts of what appears as one application to the user.
Drawback is that a change in the common/general PF will break all the *PGMs (and other file types such as DSPFs) and requires to recompile them. This can be solved by documenting dependencies, or better by automating compilation with CL or REXX scripts. This is the occasion where I truly miss Unix Makefiles.
Did anbody bother creating a basic "make" lookalike for OS/400?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_(software)
:wq! PoC
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
