But we today don't live in a time 20 years ago. RGZPFM maybe old too, bur
safe to use, while CLRPFM always be unsecure except for PF's in QTEMP.
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> På vegne af Marc
Rauzier
Sendt: 25. juli 2020 19:28
Til: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: Re: SV: REUSEDLT(*NO) - what's the point?
Le 25/07/2020 à 15:28, Helge Bichel via MIDRANGE-L a écrit :
RGZPFM works fine even on PF's with *zero records (just tested it).
It's safer to use RGZPFM because when using CLRPFM you must check for
active records.
It might depend on the version. I remember that several years ago (well,
let's say 20 years or so), I had to write a program to reorganize members if
they have less than a given ratio of deleted records.
Therefore the program was aware of the number of records of the member (I
don't remember exactly what I did, probably DSPFD *MBRLIST output to get the
list of members). At this time, RGZPFM was sending back an exception when
the member had 0 record. So I could safely use CLRPFM to remove the unused
space of empty members.
Marc
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com
midrange.com
