RE: APPN/APPC Data Transfer Benchmark? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: APPN/APPC Data Transfer Benchmark?
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:19:59 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I do not believe there is a single part of SNDMSG which requires SNA.

We used to use SNDNETSPLF as a way to archive spool files. We don't anymore. H/A software helps. Weaning off of reliance on spool files is another.

I do not believe your unix way of taring files and sending them to a remote system would save the object authorities on the individual objects. Would it?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: APPN/APPC Data Transfer Benchmark? , Patrik Schindler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.