|
On Nov 18, 2019, at 3:16 PM, Rich Loeber <rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We are being told by IBM that RPGLE is problematic when attempting to create a *PGM object that is threadsafe. Unfortunately, we are not getting a good explanation and we are being told that we have to re-code our solution in C. For some reason, this doesn't sound kosher to us.
For a *PGM to be threadsafe, are there certain things that need to be avoided?
Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
http://www.kisco.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.