Re: Saving INBOUND JSON (sent from the Web App) to the IFS

That's why I have trouble with the intertubes.  :)

I also am not found of texting as a substitute for phone calls.  Great as an additional communications medium, horrible if you need any sort of synchronous communication.

But hey, I'm an old bisync guy at heart, I guess...


On 7/29/2019 3:14 PM, B Stone wrote:

That would make more sense, Joe. For sure. I know I leave out words
writing AND reading things. :)

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I'm wondering if Nadir inadvertently left off a "not" in that sentence.
As in "IBM does not say it is not handy". That would actually make more
sense as a response to "it's ALWAYS come in handy", especially when the
next sentence is talking about an RFE.

Maybe that's just how I read it. :)


On 7/29/2019 2:50 PM, B Stone wrote:

And if we add "we plan too..." to the front, it's what I also read. No
issues there.

I was commenting on the part where IBM said it's not handy, same message,
same poster.

"IBM does not say it is handy."

My comment was that if IBM had actually used their own product, they'd
realize it (logging the incoming and outgoing JSON)) IS handy.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com