Re: Large volume file move

[Raul Jager <raul@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Will it be better to store a lot of files as blob in a table?.  They
will count as one object, and I think back up will be faster.  But I
have no experience, I am just asking.

On 9/26/18 2:55 PM, Richard Schoen wrote:
> OK, I think I got it.
>
> He would definitely need to do lots of scenario testing before replacing his current method of using Windows for IFS document storage.
>
> Especially due to the object permissions and backup/recovery potential issues.
>
> I still vote for leaving the IFS objects on the Windows server being backed up with backup exec, however it's not my shop.
>
> FWIW: One way to speed up overall small file backup on a Windows server as well is to create a Virtual Hard Drive (VHD) similar to the iASP.
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schoen
> Director of Document Management
> e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> p. 952.486.6802
> w. helpsystems.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> message: 3
> date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:41:25 -0500
> from: "Jim Oberholtzer" <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: RE: Large volume file move
>
> It would be one object, however as I pointed out the advantage of backing
> that up as one object is all but eliminated with Asynchronous Bring.
>
> The other disadvantage would be in order to back up the UDFS, you would have
> to bring down the iASP for the duration of the save.  Not terribly useful.
>
>
> I addressed speed of backup in an earlier post where you get a primary
> backup, then only add incremental backups of new objects appended to the
> same tape.
>
> On a monthly or quarterly basis resave the entire iASP and start over to
> maintain audit controls .
>
> --
> Jim Oberholtzer
> Agile Technology Architects

-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color --
            -- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --