× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why - what possible benefit other than increased complexity and another
failure point?


Jon Paris



Jon --

``I'm glad you asked that ...'' :)

Answer: Two-tier or three-tier is a better architecture for secure, robust
apps drawing data from IBM i.

Microservices allow a factoring of functionality. Delivery of end services
on the second tier is a composition from extant, well-formed verbs.

Microservices are rapid to code and fit in with development sprints.

Let IBM i do what IBM i does best: Store and deliver data.

Let Linux do what Linux does best: provide a development environment and
hosting platform for outward-facing end-user web services.

Why everyone tries to squeeze the web server down onto the IBM i, where it
is harder to develop, runs slower, and exposes the server more to the
outside world, is only barely understandable, though I do understand.

My clients who tried to shoehorn the whole legacy modernization onto the i
itself have all regretted it and moved to multi-tier.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.