Here is a suggestion: make sure that the activation group for the program is not *NEW. Use a named activation group and make that the program is not closed between call.
Denis Robitaille
Chef de service TI - Solution d'entreprise
Infrastructure et opérations
CASCADES CENTRE DES TECHNOLOGIES
412 Marie Victorin
Kingsey falls(Québec) Canada J0A 1B0
Tél : 819 363 6100 Poste :52130
Cell : 819 352 9362
-----Message d'origine-----
De : MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Rich Loeber
Envoyé : 9 avril 2018 11:50
À : Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : File Trigger Performance
I have a customer using one of our products that employs a physical file
trigger program for READ. The trigger program is an ILE program that
starts up in a CLLE. The first steps in the CLLE are to retrieve the run
status (batch or interactive) and then check a setting in a data area. If
the job is running in batch and the setting from the data area tells the
program to ignore batch reads, then a RETURN is immediately issued.
Seems easy enough, but the customer is reported very poor performance now
on batch applications.
Any ideas?
Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
[1]
http://www.kisco.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1.
http://www.kisco.com/
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
midrange.com
