Re: Read all about it - 8 IBM RFE's entered. Vote now!

[Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

To Charles' point - for temporal support you add a couple columns to the 
main table - AND you have an additional table - the historical table - 
with the same format as the main one - hence the extra space in any case 
- so it is not only the extra columns.

Now for those of us who have already implemented some kind of history, 
this could be about the same usage, just that the system automatically 
manages more of it.

Regards
Vern

On 9/2/2017 1:50 PM, Arco Simonse wrote:
> You are right of course. I meant to express that when FOR BUSINESS TIME
> would become available, we will convert many other tables to temporal,
> thereby going to consume _much_ more disk space ... Sorry for being unclear.
>
> Regards,
> -Arco
>
> 2017-09-02 18:14 GMT+02:00 Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > No, just an extra column or two...
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Arco Simonse <arco400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Tremendous, absolutely.
> > > And it would be a magnificent addition if the Database team would add FOR
> > > BUSINESS TIME.
> > >
> > > Hey as soon as they add that we will need double storage I guess... ;-)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > -Arco