Let me rephrase that. The portion of DNS that web browsers use doesn't
contain port numbers. There are SRV records in DNS that can point to
ports, but only a few protocols will try and look for them.
Kevin Bucknum
Senior Programmer Analyst
MEDDATA/MEDTRON
Tel: 985-893-2550
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Kevin Bucknum
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:15 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: HTTP listening ports and URL questions
DNS doesn't pertain to port numbers, only IP address.
Kevin Bucknum
Senior Programmer Analyst
MEDDATA/MEDTRON
Tel: 985-893-2550
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Booth Martin
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:12 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: HTTP listening ports and URL questions
I have asked this question before and do not remember an answer that
dealt with the question.
Why not use the DNS on your iSeries? So, for example, an iSeries named
Thor might have a section named ThorAR and resolve to 1.0.0.1:461 and
another section named ThorAP could resolve to 1.0.0.1:6060. Then comes
the fun of creating a logical naming scheme, but that gets to be fun.
Then your users and programmers do not need to concern themselves with
port numbers, etc. That becomes an exercise for whomever handles the
DNS.
Since no one suggested this solution there must be a reason not to do
it. And yes, I understand I will undoubtedly be mortified when I read
the answer. But in this case my curiosity outweighs my fear of
humiliation.
On 11/2/2016 7:08 AM, Steinmetz, Paul wrote:
I have some questions related to HTTP listening ports and URLs.
I have a current instance listening on port 443, all IPS.
I have a new app going live that we prefer to listen on port 443. It
can listen on a different port, but I've been told that if 443 is not
used, then we must include the port number in the URL.
We would like to have the new app keep the same URL as the old current
app, which is listening on port 80.
So my issue is that I will have two http apps listening on port 443.
Options.
1) Create one http instance for both, using virtual host. The problem
with this option is that when one app needs to be shutdown, we don't
wish to shut down the other app.
2) Have both apps listen on 443, two http instances, different IPs.
I'm leaning towards this solution.
3) Are there others?
Thank You
_____
Paul Steinmetz
IBM i Systems Administrator
Pencor Services, Inc.
462 Delaware Ave
Palmerton Pa 18071
610-826-9117 work
610-826-9188 fax
610-349-0913 cell
610-377-6012 home
psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pencor.com/
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.