× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'll do my best to answer what I can - remember that OAR is a redirection of the IO processing - you specify something that will be called INSTEAD of the RPG IO code.

So because, as I understand it, RPG and SQL don't work the same for field procs, this takes the RPG IO requests and converts them to equivalent SQL processing.

It's all an INSTEAD, not a supplement.

Hope that makes sense - and that

On 7/29/2016 11:17 AM, Nathan Andelin wrote:
IBM wants to get all of us using the SQL capabilities and the SQE engine
so this might be the perfect thing to do that.

I agree that's a presumption implied in the article. But it doesn't really
answer my question of what value SQL I/O added to FIELDPROC encryption. Was
it SQL I/O that solved the problem, or was it supplemental logic in OAR
that solved the problem?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.