RE: Weird CPFA09E/CPD384E on a SAV

< CHGATR OBJ('/your/problem/file') ATR(*ALWCKPWRT) VALUE(*YES)>

Will have impact, already tested.

SAVBRM along with ALWCKPWRT was mainly created for saving Domino while active.
Domino also had save code changes, added, that if a item was missed, it would be marked for the next save.
BRMS support recommends NOT to use SAVBRM and/or ALWCKPWRT, because the status of the IFS save would be unknown.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark S Waterbury
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 1:57 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Weird CPFA09E/CPD384E on a SAV

James:

This might also help:

CHGATR OBJ('/your/problem/file') ATR(*ALWCKPWRT) VALUE(*YES)

HTH,

Mark S. Waterbury

On 3/14/2016 12:47 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
This weekend, I discovered some locked-up daily backup jobs, with
CPFA09E and CPD384E messages for three IFS files.

Looking up CPFA09E, I found this page
<http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1016325>
which says:

If an Integrated File System object is checked out and the UPDHST
parameter is set to *YES (the default), the save operation will
receive message CPFA09E.

. . .

If an Integrated File System object is checked OUT and UPDHST is set
to *NO on the SAV command (as seen in the following example), this
could be used as a work-around

But in fact, the default for UPDHST is *NO.

The only way I could find locks was to bring up iNav (I'd forgotten I
even HAD a working iNav!) and look at the "Use" tab of "Properties" on
them. One has a single job "Shared (All) - Write only," while the
other two have a single job each "Shared (All) - Read/Write."

I tried a command line save of just the IFS directory,

SAV DEV('/qsys.lib/qtemp.lib/foo.file') OBJ(('/foo/bar/db'
*INCLUDE)) SAVACT(*YES) SAVACTOPT(*ALL) CLEAR(*ALL) DTACPR(*HIGH)

and got this:

Save-while-active checkpoint processing complete.
Object in use. Object is /foo/bar/db/bazdb.lck.
Cannot open object /foo/bar/db/bazdb.lck.
Object in use. Object is /foo/bar/db/bazdb.lobs.
Cannot open object /foo/bar/db/bazdb.lobs.
Object in use. Object is /foo/bar/db/bazdb.log.
Cannot open object /foo/bar/db/bazdb.log.
4 objects saved. 3 objects not saved.

And yet, I can look at the contents of the files with DSPF or even EDTF.

The files are being used by a webapp context running in a Tomcat
server, in connection with Google Integration, and I'm told that they
are HSQLDB files (why we are using HSQLDB and not DB2/400, I don't know).

Any insights as to what's going on?

--
JHHL