× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From the vendor's perspective they've probably done extensive testing and
it works for them.
If you add any extensions to their software you do so at your own peril.

I don't agree with it, but it is an opinion.

There's a lot of things I disagree with about many vendor packages but
they get the job done.
Some things I disagree with:
- No journalling by default
- No commitment control
- No referential integrity
- No check constraints
- No primary keys on tables

These all concern me.

From a higher level perspective I much prefer a vendor who actively
participates in IBM's Early Ship Program and is ready to run on the latest
release on the date of announcement of a new release or, at the latest,
date of General Availability. This means a LOT more to me than support of
V3R2 onward to 6.1 and some weak statement that they have a customer or
two that's running it on something higher but that's at your own peril.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.