should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list?
From: Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:30:58 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I ask because because in the latest DB ptf group a file
object called "LIBLIST" was produced.
it is a view over QSYS2.QSQLIBL.

I notice that there are lots of objects that don't
have "Q" names in QSYS2...

we had some apps break because we had a production file
of the same name...

I presume that in the PTF cover letters it would have
told me of this.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.