× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Roger Harman <roger.harman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fiscal weeks could be 52, 53, or even 54 (once every 28
years - 2000 was one of them). I remember having to
tweak things to deal with that 54 week year.

In my last post, I said I would recommend using the ISO definition, if
for no other reason than specifically to avoid the 54-week year. But
you bring up a good point, which is that sometimes it's not a choice
you can make.

Since I gave Rob a bit of grief for his 365.4 days, I'll be "fair" and
point out the nit here as well: The 54-week year happens *at most*
every 28 years. Across most century boundaries, occurrences are
separated by 40 years instead of 28 (because most century years are
NOT leap years; 2000 was an oddball because it's divisible by 400).
Using the week system which allows 54-week years, a 54-week year
occurs 13 times in every 400-year period.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.