That's unacceptable in this day and age.

I'd be sure and point out that IBM's jobs don't run under a QSECOFR class

Assuming you've got maint with IBM. You might consider asking IBM to apply
pressure on the vendor.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

3rd party vendor claims their job(s) must run as QSECOFR, I tested and
made it work in R&D without QSECOFR.

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact