That's unacceptable in this day and age.
I'd be sure and point out that IBM's jobs don't run under a QSECOFR class
Assuming you've got maint with IBM. You might consider asking IBM to apply
pressure on the vendor.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
3rd party vendor claims their job(s) must run as QSECOFR, I tested and
made it work in R&D without QSECOFR.