× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Zak,
Since I have not seen this suggestion elsewhere, I will put in my $.02.
You can do what you want in OPNQRYF, *but* you must build the entire
OPNQRYF command in a variable, then use QCMDEXC to execute it.
By doing this, you can set the fixed portion as a constant, and then build
the MAPFLD section based on your requirements.
This is not hard to do, but it is a bit messy.
I used to do this back when on the S/38 (anyone remember that system :) )
way before SQL was generally available.


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Zak Metz <Zak.Metz@xxxxxx> wrote:

Jon, sounds like you're saying I should change the Cobol. I'm assuming the
file spec will need to be different based on if the file is really keyed or
not, like RPG. That's a possibility, even if my initial plan was not to
change the Cobol. Keep in mind the input file is currently not keyed. I
could generate the DDS and compile an LF on the fly, though. Thanks for
your expertise!

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:54 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Sort input file by arbitrary position/length

I agree with Buck - the COBOL program really needs a small tweak. It is
reading in physical sequence because it has not been told it is a keyed
file. RPG would do the same if the file were defined without the K in the
F-spec.

You could either leave the existing file refs in place and add a new
indexed file, or add indexing to the spec for the existing file.

I suspect that the COBOL program (as long as there is no actual START
operation or anything else that uses a key) will not actually check if the
key is in the spot specified - but telling it to use a key will make it
request the data in keyed sequence. No guarantees as the COBOL compiler
does some stuff just to ensure ANSI compliance - and since most systems
don't have externally described files key location may be tested at run
time but ...


On 2013-09-24, at 3:54 PM, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 9/24/2013 3:08 PM, Zak Metz wrote:
I have an existing COBOL application that cannot be changed, at least,
let's say it can't.
The COBOL application accepts an input file of an arbitrary record
length like so:
SELECT C1BMNAM
ASSIGN TO DISK-C1BMNAM
FILE STATUS C1BMNAM-FILE-STATUS
.
I want it to process the file sorted by a certain position/length (ZIP
Code) determined at run time. But if I create an LF, it doesn't read it in
order by key.
What I thought I could do was use OPNQRYF to do that sorting on the
fly, something like:
OPNQRYF FILE((METZ3410/PF)) KEYFLD((*MAPFLD/ZIP)) MAPFLD((ZIP
'%sst(pf 133 5)')) OPNID(C1BMNAM) SEQONLY(*NO) OPNSCOPE(*JOB) That
works for a file with one field. The COBOL is none-the-wiser.
But the input file might have multiple fields. All I know is the
position/length.
Is there some way to make my MAPFLD substring the entire record without
knowing what field the position/length actually falls into? I just want to
substring the entire record.
Because the file may be very large, I do not want to take the
performance hit of copying it to a single-field file. But if there were
some other way to trick it...
Thanks in advance for any and all suggestions.

I never imagined a tagalong sort would be a good fit in 2013.

I still don't.

This seems like a utility of some sort. If you're satisfied with the
OPNQRYF solution, consider writing a front-end that programmatically
generates those specs and compiles the CLP.

Considering the amount of work you are going to be going through to
keep the existing Cobol program unchanged, for the sake of
completeness you ought to consider the amount of work it would take to
tweak the Cobol program instead.
--buck
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com




--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



________________________________

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.