I would much rather see IBM implement %SCANRPL rather than %REPLACE in
CL. %REPLACE was, IMHO, never quite what people were looking for. And
hardly gives you anything you couldn't do with %SUBST/%SST.
On 4/15/2013 2:57 PM, Vern Hamberg wrote:
I'm hoping IBM comes out with a %replace, too, for CL.