Now that you mention it, Vern, you're probably right. Sorry Jim -- I've
just run into more than 1 person that thought *MODULE objects were
necessary for using the service program, rather than just for creating it.
On 2/7/2013 2:39 PM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
Hi Peter
Is it possible that Jim meant multiple service programs, and not
including the modules?
Vern
On 2/7/2013 3:56 PM, Peter Dow wrote:
Hi Jim,
What do you mean by "fewer objects to distribute"?
Modules are not required for anything except creating the service
program -- once the service program has been created, the *MODULE
objects are not required for execution.
So if you're a software vendor, I'd recommend getting rid of all *MODULE
objects in your distribution package.
--
*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
petercdow@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:petercdow@xxxxxxxxx>
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/
On 2/7/2013 9:26 AM, Horn, Jim wrote:
Other than having a fewer objects to distribute, is there an advantage to
having multiple modules in a service program, rather than 1 service program
per module?
Jim
