RE: renamed to: Get users to stop saying AS/400

Robert,

Makes sense to me...and interestingly enough, yours is the only one so far
that I've seen that hasn't a pithy retort to it... :)

I think that the MAJORITY of the MIDRANGE world agrees with you.

DR2

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Ostrowski
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:31 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: renamed to: Get users to stop saying AS/400

If you ask someone for a Kleenex, and all they have in
front of them is a box of Puffs, do they tell you they don't
have any for you?

All of our management and users still use "AS400".
I don't think we'll ever escape using it.











-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Lampert
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:18 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: renamed to: Get users to stop saying AS/400

Trevor Perry wrote:

Because the AS/400 has been a dead platform for 12 years?

Because IBM sells IBM i on Power, and we want a future for out

platform?

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."
--William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene ii.

There is far more difference in both hardware and software architecture
between a current model MacBook, and the original Mac128, then there is
between, say, an E4B and a B10, and yet they're both called Macintoshes.

Likewise, far more difference between WinDoze Vista and WinDoze 286 than

there is between V7.1 and V1R1, and yet Microsloth still calls it
WinDoze.

Yet IBM feels compelled to change names more often than some people I
know change their underwear.

--
JHHL