RE: Authority to start a writer at the user level

Well that certainly confirms it! Thanks.
Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harman, Roger
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:19 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: Authority to start a writer at the user level

We have a lot of writers and need to be able to have users control them.
I spoke to Carol Woodbury at a conference about this. She confirmed
that I'd have to use a wrapper to do this if they didn't have all the
authority.

Pick up a copy of her book. There is a good example program by Paul
Tuohy in there that will detail what each user can do on a specific
writer/outq.

.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jmmckee
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:42 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Authority to start a writer at the user level

User would also either have to have a CL program behind a menu or not be
a limited user.

Curious: What do you not like about a CL running adopted authority?
Certainly could be an issue if the CL contained any command that
provided a command line. But, STRPRTWTR doesn't.

John McKee

-----Original message-----
From: "Burns, Bryan" Bryan_Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:55:41 -0500
To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Authority to start a writer at the user level

Is there any way a user without *SPLCTL and *JOBCTL can start a
printer writer without adopting authority? I've been looking at IBM
Software Technical Document 421165187 which documents the creation of
a CL so a user can start a writer using adopted authority, but before
I take this approach, I want to confirm that if the authority for both

the OUTQ and DEVD is *PUBLIC *ALL and AUTCHK for the outqueue is
*DTAAUT; the user will still not have enough authority to start a

writer.

Bryan Burns
ECHO, Incorporated