×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CRPence
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 3:58 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: View / PF Conundrum
<snip>
In the given environment, the best results will likely be had, by
removing any cross-library dependencies for the database files.
</snip>
No joke. As much as politically possible (the developer responsible is my boss), I pointed out that putting an LF/View in a library other than the one in which the PF is located is not a good idea.
I did some further testing this morning: Restoring each affected library individually (made the job log easier to read / find errors). Turns out that the PF is not deleted during the CLRLIB. Thus, when the RSTOBJ procedure runs, it refuses to restore the affected PF. All messages are responded automatically via the System Reply List, which is why I never got an error during the restore (my bad).
Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
