|
Don, maybe you should @sitalittlemore. The Starbucks is fine if you drink
their lattes, it is just their coffee that is burned.
Jon, probably no wifi - the starbucks is a franchise owned by the same hotel
with no wifi.
On 4/25/09 6:06 PM, "Don" <dr2@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jon,
As I mentioned on twitter a while back, there is no wireless. And starbucks
only serves that pikes paint remover blend...which tastes terrible and gives
me a serious case of the.....
DR2 - on twitter @fromwhereistand
===================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 3:53 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: COMMON Reno
I can see no sign of _any_ wi-fi here. It took a series of calls with
the front desk to establish that the wired connection in my room was
also dead. Maintenance fixed that (and confirmed that there is NO wi-fi
in guest rooms) and a few other problems so I'm now on line at a cost of
$12.99 a day - which is daylight robbery for the speed I'm seeing (or
not seeing).
There's a Starbucks on-site - haven't checked if there is wi-fi there.
Jon P.
midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
place...How much is the wifi costs? I understand there's no free wifi in the
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.