Re: Identifying who deleted records - trigger programs -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Milt Habeck wrote:

Stitch-in-Time overcomes the limitations of the CMJRNIMG command
which can only look at actual journal entries. Stitch-in-Time
software captures key data from journal entries and allows analysis
on that data whenever you want (e.g. long after journal receivers
have been detached and deleted).

CMPJRNIMG is record oriented while Stitch-in-Time is field oriented.
Stitch-in-Time lets you search for the changes you are interested in
by field(s), with very strong user-defined select/omit criteria. The
product only reports those changes that fit the criteria. That seems
like a better idea than wading through pages of cryptic data produced
by CMJPRNIMG.

<plug> QuestView has been able to display journal entries as if they
were records since February of 2004. </plug>

I added that capability in a futile effort to encourage end-users to journal their critical files instead of trying to use QV's own rudimentary audit-print capability for S-O auditing, instead of for its intended purpose (i.e., oops-recovery).

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.