× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We have JDE files here and we refresh our data files from out Production
iSeries to out Test/Dev iSeries using the SAVRSTOBJ command and it seems
to work ok. Our Refresh takes about 4-6 hours, we do not do the big
files every weekend, like the 0911 or 0411 or 0311.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of sjl
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:12 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Fast Copy File

All -

We were having difficulties when refreshing data libraries in our test
environments due to the long time it was taking to rebuild the logical
files over the physical files.

I determined that it was much more efficient to first /remove/ the LF
members from the logical files in the to-library /before/ doing the CPYF
command, then submitting jobs to add back the LF members once the PF was
copied - thus was born a new command I call FASTCPYF.

The underlying CPP for this command does the following:

1) DSPDBR of the PF in the to-library to an outfile to capture all of
the logical files that are dependent on the PF in the to-library
2) DSPFD of the PF in the to-library TYPE(*TRG) to an outfile to capture
any triggers on the file in the to-library
3) Removes all of the LF members from the PF in the to-library
4) Removes all of the triggers from the PF in the to-library
5) Uses CPYF to copy the from-file to the to-file
6) Using the information from DSPDBR, submits jobs to add back all of
the logical file members to the PF in the to-library
7) Using the information from DSPFD TYPE(*TRG), adds back all of the
triggers to the PF in the to-library

Have I missed anything?

From my preliminary testing on a physical file that has a lot of
logical
files, FASTCPYF can be 10 times faster than CPYF...

- sjl



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.