×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Yes, all RPG programs end with *INLR = *on. And it would be 52,000 times because the same pricing routines are called twice for each record.
The pricing routine is a very complex system and I will not be allowed to modify it unless I can justify it and then Q/A has to have the time to test it, which I am told could be a 6 month process. So I am trying to find a way to make it run faster without modifying the one set of programs that makes our business profitable.
Thanks,
Marvin
------------------------------
message: 8
date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:14:16 -0800
from: "John Earl" <john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: RE: Question about reducing program start overhead
Marvin,
You didn't reference it, so I have to ask about the most obvious
performance tax - Are you opening and closing these programs every time
you call them, or are they left open at exit?
Leaving the programs open at exit will spare you the cost of program
initialization 26000 times.
jte
--
John Earl
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
Direct: 253-479-1408
Mobile: 206-669-3336
www.powertech.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
