× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I really which IBM would make the security for DNS to be more granular.
That is I want to allow you to maintain the DNS server but not the rest
of the system covered by *IOSYSCFG. Can that be removed from the DNS
admin rule. And it is just a file on the IFS. Why can I not grant you
the necessary authority to the IFS directory / File and not give you
*ALLOBJ.

Come on IBM, I want to do my job and not be God on the system.



Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:45 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: DNS vs V6

If you are using iNav to administor dnS on your i, and you upgrade your
i to V6 then you must upgrade your iNav to V6.
The person administering dnS must now also have *IOSYSCFG (in addition
to *ALLOBJ as in the past).

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.