× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Chris,

To to be sure...

You are saying there's a performance improvement going from a 4-disk
RAID 5 that only uses 2 parity drives to a 4-disk RAID 5 that uses all
4 drives for parity.

That's what I expected, but IBM is telling us otherwise.

We've already made the move from 3-disk RAID 5 to 4-Disk RAID 5.


Thanks!
Charles


On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Chris Bipes
<chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes your performance will increase significantly. WRKDSKSTS and see
what the % busy is for the drives. If it is way out of balance, then
you will notice the change. If not, don't bother.


Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:06 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Performance Impact of going from 2 parity drives to 4
paritydrives in a 4-disk RAID set

No.

It's already a RAID 5, it will continue to be RAID 5.

Originally, it was a 3-disk RAID 5. Thus parity info was only on two
disks.

We added a 4th disk, but the OS does not automatically change the number
of disks used for parity data.

If you were to create a 4 disk RAID 5 array from scratch, parity would
be spread across all 4 disks.

So the question is is it worth the trouble of going into DST to stop and
restart RAID 5 in order to get the OS to spread the parity across all 4
disks instead of just 2 disks.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.