× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. March 2008

Re: Giving users "deposit" access to an output queue.

Is "add" more restrictive than *EXCLUDE? Because with *EXCLUDE the SBMFAX
will deposit it into the output queue - all well and good. However, the
user can still do a WRKSPLF and delete the spool file, while fax is trying
to send it.

I am starting to think that I will have to roll my own. Basically use a
command exit point program to capture DLTSPLF. If it tries to delete a
spool file that is in the output queue FAXD0... then send an escape
message telling them that they cannot delete the spool file because it is
a "fax in process".

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.