RE: Statement of readiness for V6R1

Thanks for the link. That was a good chat. Apparently their version of
"V6R1 ready" and mine differ. I just want the ISV to say they ran
ANZOBJCVN and everything passed with flying colors. Others want it
already, either compiled on V6R1, or had STROBJCVN, or converted during
restore to V6R1, in order to bypass the conversion time. While I can
respect the desire to minimize conversion time, I really am pushing for
the former for a couple of reasons. Mainly, I'd like V6R1 tested in beta
before going GA. It really does no good to the community to have an early
ship member only installing V6R1 on an lpar that is only running Domino. I
am sure that IBM tested the heck out of that. It would be more beneficial
if they could install V6R1 on an lpar running BPCS, SoftLanding's
Turnover, TL Ashford's barcoding software, etc. Alas, none of these pass
ANZOBJCVN. Kind of funny that a vendor that issues a statement that they
only support current versions of the OS would release a program in the
last couple of months with no observability and compiled down to V4R5.

I'll have to remember this from the chat:
For ISV software, you may also want to contact the System i ISV group, at
iaic@xxxxxxxxxx

Rob Berendt