× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Previous postings:

date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:07:39 -0600
from: "Dick Superneau" <DSuperneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: FTP problem CPD0095

I have a CL that is a copy of another program that I use to FTP data
from our system to one of our customers. The program is to put two
files from our system into the directory at the customer's FTP site.
The second put is successful. The first put ends up with zero bytes
transferred even though the file on the 520 is not empty. When I step
through the program, the override to input and override to output does
not produce any errors. After the FTP step, the job log shows the
following two statements:

Numeric value for parameter SEQONLY is not valid.

Error found on OVRDBF command.

When I look at the first error, the detail message is: CPD0095
Numeric value for parameter SEQONLY is not valid.

It appears that the message is generated inside the FTP call itself.
Google on CPD0095 didn't help me. Can anyone give me a clue as to what
is happening? If I leave the overrides to input and output in place,
run the program but do not call the FTP process, there is no error. I
cannot tell from the messages what override is being talked about.



Thanks for any input, Dick

date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:18:20 -0500
from: "Francis Lapeyre" <flapeyre@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: FTP problem CPD0095

The numeric part for SEQONLY parameter in OVRDBF must be in the range 1
to
32767 - are you outside of that range?

date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:40:57 -0400
from: rob@xxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: FTP problem CPD0095

Left over override hanging around perhaps?

If you sign off, sign back on and try a simple OVRDBF and FTP do you
get
the same error?

wait. A simple DSPJOB OPTION(*FILOVR) should show you this.


Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com

End of MIDRANGE-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1891

When I used WRKACTJOB and watched the open files, I noticed that the
program where the data is input into the file is different from the
other FTP programs in that it is a ILE program (two modules). As a
result the files are opened in QILE activation group. So the file
"appears to be empty" at the FTP point and so the numeric part for
SEQONLY is 0. Now I need to get the called programs to recognize the
activation group and I should be good to go. I plan on using activation
group *CALLER for the called programs and see what happens. I had
recompiled all the CL programs to run in QILE, but that didn't help.

Thanks, Dick


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.