|
Elvis, thanks for the detailed reply. 1. I'm checking this out. I've changed the QPWFSERVER class to top out at 1GB. Odd, that. DSPCLS displays max temp in MB; CHGCLS lets you change it in KB. Anyway, this says it still doesn't enforce a cap on QTEMP storage. I'm not sure off-hand if that'll prove to be an issue or not. 2. I've already tried restricting the user's max storage; didn't do anything. That's why I asked about limiting QUSER. I dislike changing IBM objects and am a little torn between changing the QUSER USRPRF and the QPWFSERVER CLS. QPWFSERVER is more localized to our issue but we work with classes so rarely (and user profiles so frequently) that I'm afraid changes to QPWFSERVER will be forgotten even if documented. 3. No budget for extra tools right now. Believe me I wish I had some $ to spend.. Anyway, while we're not at V5R4 yet, we are now current on V5R3 cume & Group PTFs. 4. We went down that road last summer. Had IBM DB2 gurus help our Crystal folks figure out the best way to access the dbs. Also led to a number of indexes being created for their most common queries. Did wonders for performance & response time. Thanks,
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.