× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.





The problem is that the update/insert run sequentially in the same
thread thus when the trigger on File A is called, File B hasn't been
updated yet. I need the updated info in File B. I was hoping to run my
program in a different thread, and force it to wait for the File B
update.

<rob-tksaTn4SAz0AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:<OFB5DEC9EB.2DBBE1CC-ON85257297.00530F5E-85257297.0053C4C0@xxxxxxxx
m>...
Why does file B cause an issue?

Do you fear that the fact that the trigger program may have a record
lock 
and then update program may try to do something and conflict?
Remember, 
the trigger runs sequentially.  Therefore it won't return to the
calling 
program until it is completely done.

Do you fear that the calling program may already have a record lock
thus 
conflicting with the trigger program?  If so, then having the trigger
put 
off the access to B to a data queue or anything may not buy you
anything 
if don't free up the lock in the original program before the data
queue 
processor tries to access B.

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





"Wes" <destaw-IYLBcaqmmjSwZA6j3JqgvUEOCMrvLtNR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/06/2007 05:58 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
<midrange-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
midrange-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Fax to

Subject
SQL Proc and Call Statment






I'm working a program that will send an e-mail based on a insert
trigger 
on 
Table A. In the trigger, we also look up Table B. The problem is that 
Table 
B is updated/inserted after Table A, and the update is running in the
same 

thread. I was thinking of creating  SQL proc (proc would sleep for 2 
seconds) and call it from the trigger.
Is it possible to force the procedure to run in a different thread (so

it's 
not blocked by the sleep etc)? 



-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing

list
To post a message email:
MIDRANGE-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email:
MIDRANGE-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.