|
It's a matter of application design. Canned packages are typically written and tested on dedicated servers. If you design an application so that it assumes a dedicated processor and memory and then you run it on a machine with a slower multi-tasking processor that has less memory, then what do you expect will happen? On the other hand, if you design your application so that the business logic is contained in an RPG back end and the application server is primarily a simple UI layer, then you'll find that the application works fine whether the application server runs on the host or a dedicated client. To be clear, Tomcat on a dedicated Windows or Linux machine will outperform WAS on an iSeries; the issue is whether the overhead of running on the iSeries offsets: 1. The complexity of supporting multiple production environments. 2. The added point of failure. 3. The lack of IBM support. As I always say, it's a business decision, not a religious one. Joe
From: Dave Odom Gang, How can I increase the performance of WAS so an application running thereunder will perform as good or better than its Windoz counterpart?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.