|
--- Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh. Then it is a design issue. > > VARPG uses a runtime environment. If you try to use that model then, > yes, updates would be tiresome. > > However the runtime is only about 15 megs. Building it into the > application locks the two together, and updates are no longer an issue. > I stored the application (including runtime) on a server. When a user > opens the desktop version, the desktop version checks to see if its > still King. If not, it replaces itself with the newer version. > Downloading 20 megs once in a while from a server is not much of a > burden imho. > > Still, the fact remains, VARPG can't gain traction. > Why?? Marco __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
