× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Agh.


> From: David Gibbs
> 
> I found this while stumbling around today ...
> 
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14800/info
> 
>  IBM OS/400 osp-cert is susceptible to multiple vulnerabilities.

Whoever posted the message to SecurityFocus (and I think we all know who
that was, don't we?) was very careful in misstating and misrepresenting
the issues involved.


> The first identified vulnerability is a flaw in local Certificate
> Authority certificates. During the creation of these certificates,
X.509
> basic constraints are not added. Since the local Certificate Authority
> certificates are not properly identified as valid Certificate
> Authorities, the proper validation of these certificates is
impossible,
> as is the verification of certificate chains that are derived from it.

All this means is that anybody who is properly following RFC2459 (and
the subsequent RFC2632) will reject these certifications because they
don't have the mandatory basic constraints.  If you understand how basic
constraints work, they are used limit the role of a certification when
it is from a CA; if you don't see this extension, you don't accept the
cert as coming from a CA.  As client software tightens the rules, you
have to get your own processes up to speed.


> The next issue is a failure of the application to properly return
> renewed certificates once they have been made available. This issue is
> due to a failure of the application to properly notice altered
> certificate store files during operation.

This is simply an enhancement that fixes a long-standing issue in the
X.509 standard.


> There are also multiple unspecified ASN.1 parsing vulnerabilities. No
> further information about these issues are currently available.

This is indeed a vulnerability.  However, it is a vulnerability in the
X.509 standards, one that conceivably be used to cause a buffer overrun
in not only Solaris, but also virtually every Microsoft operating
system.  However, since buffer overruns simply don't happen on i5/OS,
it's not really an issue.  However, it could conceivably cause an
exception in the IKE server and thus cause a denial of service, so IBM
fixed it.


> These issues allow attackers to potentially subvert, bypass, or
possibly
> alter the security properties of the cryptographic software. The exact
> impact and possible attack scenarios are not known at this time.

This is just a lie.


For more information about the vulnerabilities:

http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/o-065.shtml
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS04-011.mspx


Joe


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.