× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.







To me, the general consensus seems to be that users are seeing a pretty
drastic reduction of disk arms (making use of the 15k RPM drives and the
new controllers) and getting the same or greater performance.  Pretty
vague, but that's what i've noticed.

                                                                           
             Al Barsa                                                      
             <barsa@barsaconsu                                             
             lting.com>                                                 To 
             Sent by:                  Midrange Systems Technical          
             midrange-l-bounce         Discussion                          
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>           
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
             08/30/2005 10:51                                      Subject 
             AM                        Re: IBM disk arm reduction "rule of 
                                       thumb"                              
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Midrange Systems                                              
                 Technical                                                 
                Discussion                                                 
             <midrange-l@midra                                             
                 nge.com>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           





Unfortunately, I don't know of a rule of thumb.

However, this is why IBM is adding faster drives, and more cache on the
IOAs.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads

Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com




             plancor@stcharles
             il.gov
             Sent by:                                                   To
             midrange-l-bounce         Midrange Systems Technical
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            Discussion
                                       <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
                                                                        cc
             08/30/2005 10:04
             AM                                                    Subject
                                       IBM disk arm reduction "rule of
                                       thumb"
             Please respond to
             Midrange Systems
                 Technical
                Discussion
             <midrange-l@midra
                 nge.com>






Hello All,

Does anyone know if IBM has a "rule of thumb" on the acceptable level of
disk arm reductions?  We are in the process of developing a configuration
for a new 520.  Our current 820 has 18 disk arms.  One vendor suggests
reducing to 8 in the main box (no tower).  Another vendor recommends 12
utilizing a tower.  The reasoning is that at our current peak disk
accesses, we would need that many to keep the disk ops/second at 60 or
below.   Both quotes are for 4326 35G/15K disk units.

All comments/suggestions would be most appreciated.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_____________________________________________________________________________

Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________


ForwardSourceID:NT00029D5E

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For 
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.