|
I would agree David, there are no savings on cost, its strictly a DNS issue really......an A record pointing to a specific IP address and then a CNAME record pointing to the A record. On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:31:12 -0500, David Gibbs wrote > rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > That's one of the few aspects in which our company got a little cheap too. > > http://www.dekko.com works but not http://dekko.com Just pennies I know, > > but ... > > I cannot envision *ANY* possible savings from not having a www subdomain. > > http://midrange.com and http://www.midrange.com both point to the > same server. > > In most cases, however, I setup the domain.com address to simply > redirect to the www.domain.com address. > > david > > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) > mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To > subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: > http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: > MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment > to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. If you bought, it was hauled by a truck - somewhere, sometime.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.