Re: SrvPgms and Change Management

>On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:26:12 -0400, "Fleming, Greg (ED)" 
><GFLEMING@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>David Gibbs wrote:

>> Well, what was the reason for the failure?
>
>If I'm reading the joblog correctly, it is trying to compile the
>"related objects" (i.e. the calling programs) and looks in every library
>except the production library to find the source, and never does find
>it.  The production library is listed in the library list at the top of
>the log.   I think you're right that we probably have a setup issue.  It
>shouldn't be a binder source issue, since at this point I'm not even
>changing the module.  I'm just checking it out and promoting it to learn
>how the process works.   No new procedures..no signature changes.  
>We'll look at our IM setup and see if we can identify anything wrong,
>then call IM support if we can't find anything.  
>Greg Fleming

We have Implementer set up to *NOT* automatically add the related objects to
the request.  IIRC, when we first set it up we were having problems with it
knowing (correctly) what needed to be recompiled.  This also puts the onus
on the developers to make sure that they have reviewed everything which is
affected by a change.

Gord