|
Dave wrote: >>Would there be a problem in letting the users use QM itself? It has >>all you're looking for built in. I'm trying to wrap this up into a utility, so want to make it as simple as possible. Since my company sells software (including utility software), we don't really have users as such - just customers, who will have this utility added to the software package they currently buy. An alternative would be trying determine where the SQL defaults for a session are kept and hacking/overriding those somehow.. Rory
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.